About 700,000 women undergo hysterectomy every year in the United States.
The vast majority of these are performed for benign conditions, most commonly
uterine fibroids. Unfortunately, at least 70% of these hysterectomies
are still performed by laparotomy.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that 90-95% of these surgeries can
be safely and successfully performed vaginally or by laparoscopic techniques.
When laparotomy is avoided, postoperative pain is greatly reduced, the
hospital stay is shortened by 1 to 3 days, recovery is shortened by 2
to 4 weeks, and the patient can return to normal activities much more
rapidly.
Why are more women not offered these advantages? Unfortunately, many
gynecologists are either not well trained in the techniques of vaginal
and/or laparoscopic techniques or have very little experience with them.
Most can perform laparotomy, so they recommend that method to their patients.
Myths concerning the route by which hysterectomy can or should be performed
include:
If you have had a cesarean section, vaginal hysterectomy cannot
be done. Numerous studies have shown this to be completely false.
Skilled and experienced gynecologic surgeons do not consider 1, 2, or
3 prior cesarean sections to present a problem in performing vaginal or
laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
You have never been pregnant or delivered a child vaginally,
therefore you must be opened to perform your hysterectomy. Laparoscopically
assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
(TLH), and Laparoscopically assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH)
were developed with this situation in mind. All three avoid the problems
associated with laparotomy.
Because you have fibroids, your hysterectomy must be performed
by laparotomy. Using vaginal or laparoscopic "marcellation"
techniques fibroids as large as a basketball can be removed without laparotomy.
10 to 12 centimeter fibroid uteri are routinely removed using thest techniques.
Smaller ones are much simpler.
We can't see as well if we use a laparoscope or do the case vaginally.
It is difficult to see the structures in the pelvis during vaginal
hysterectomy. The laparoscope, however, offers 6 to 8 power magnification.
We can, in fact, see the entire pelvis much better with a laparoscope
than with the naked eye. Difficult surgery can be done more precisely
because of this advantage.
Your hysterectomy simply cannot be done vaginally and the laparoscope
is too risky. If the gynecologist is sufficiently skilled with
vaginal and laparoscopic surgical techniques and has enough experience
with these procedures, the need for laparotomy (for benign conditions)
will be very rare. The most experienced gynecologic surgeons resort to
laparotomy less than 5% of the time to complete hysterectomy for benign
conditions.
Hysterectomy is your only alternative. Although hysterectomy
may indeed be your best alternative for treatment of benign conditions,
it is rarely your only option. If your gynecologist cannot or will not
discuss other treatment alternatives, a second opinion might be a good
idea.
Because my gynecologist says it can't be done, it can't be done.
Unfortunately, this is often incorrect. For many reasons, gynecologists
may not believe that any particular hysterectomy can be done by any other
method than laparotomy. Simply ask if there is an alternative method.
If your gynecologist is not familiar with vaginal or laparoscopic techniques
to perform difficult hysterectomies, ask if he or she can refer you to
someone who is.
|